Back to landing

1X2 GRID SOFTWARE COMPARISON

THE GOALMATRIX DIFFERENCE VS OTHER GRID SOFTWARE

A visual comparison on the same 15-match grid: same fixtures, same starting structure and the same filter families. The goal is to show what Zone A/B control adds to classic filtering.15 MATCHES · 3 SINGLES · 8 DOUBLES · 4 TRIPLES · 20,736 COMBINATIONS
01

01 · SAME GRID, SAME STARTING POINT

Before filtering, both tools work from the same 20,736-combination universe. Full screenshots make the comparison inspectable.

Reference grid — classic approach
Reference grid — classic approach
The same grid in GoalMatrix
The same grid in GoalMatrix
02

02 · SAME FILTER FAMILIES, FINER CONTROL

Equivalent functions are compared first, then the extra control available in GoalMatrix.

Same starting setting · Total 1 / N / 2 signs

Classic approachThe filter sets the global number of desired signs. In this example, the maximum number of ‘1’ signs is 7.
Classic approach — Same starting setting · Total 1 / N / 2 signs
GoalMatrixGoalMatrix starts with the same global setting: maximum 7 ‘1’ signs. The calculation basis remains comparable and no prediction is changed.
GoalMatrix — Same starting setting · Total 1 / N / 2 signs

Number of signs by zone

Classic approachThe classic setting remains global across all 15 matches.
Classic approach — Number of signs by zone
GoalMatrixGoalMatrix then adds Zone A and Zone B: with the same global total, local distributions can be constrained. The engine changes no sign; it only keeps or removes combinations according to your limits.
GoalMatrix — Number of signs by zone

Consecutive runs

Classic approachRun-length control according to match order.
Classic approach — Consecutive runs
GoalMatrixGoalMatrix can set separate run limits for 1, N and 2 inside each zone.
GoalMatrix — Consecutive runs

Targeted preferences

Classic approachPreferences on a selected group of fixtures.
Classic approach — Targeted preferences
GoalMatrixTargeted preferences combine with zones and other active filters without changing predictions.
GoalMatrix — Targeted preferences
02B

FINAL GRID VERIFICATION

After filtering and calculation, GoalMatrix can also test the final grid. In this example, the tester identifies an exact 15/15 combination.

GoalMatrix tester showing an exact WINNER 15 out of 15 combination

Result observed in the tester for this example. No future result or winnings are guaranteed.

03

03 · FOUR PRECISION FILTERS ACTIVE, ALREADY 324 GRIDS

Four filters are active together in this demonstration: 01 Total signs, 03 Consecutive runs by zone, 04 Number of signs by zone and 06 Targeted preferences. The screen shows 20,736 raw grids and 324 after filtering.

GoalMatrix filter cockpit with 4 active filters — 01, 03, 04 and 06 — 20,736 raw grids and 324 after filtering

This demonstration uses 4 of the 6 available filters. GoalMatrix lets you combine them according to your own strategy; each setting only keeps or removes combinations that match your criteria.

04

04 · THE 20,736 → 324 EXAMPLE, STEP BY STEP

These are cumulative volumes: each stage keeps combinations that satisfy every constraint already active.

0120,736 · raw grid
028,658 · zone runs
03692 · zone signs
04324 · targeted preferences

Stronger reduction is not a result promise; it only reflects the filtering rules chosen by the user.

WHY ZONES A/B CHANGE CONTROL

A global ceiling may still allow an unbalanced distribution inside part of the grid. Zones add local limits alongside global limits.

Local control · set different limits for different parts of the grid.
Composable filters · combine signs, runs and preferences using your criteria.
Visible calculation · track retained combinations and cost at every stage.

1X2 grid software, football pools generator and combination reduction

1N2 GoalMatrix is online 1X2 grid software for 7-to-16-match football pools, singles, doubles and triples, combination filtering, exact testing and CSV or Excel export.

COMPARISON METHODOLOGY

The comparisons on this page are based on real configurations and screenshots using the parameters shown. Filtering and reduction results depend on the selected settings and are neither a promise of sporting results nor a guarantee of winnings.

Third-party trademarks, trade names, interfaces and visual elements remain the property of their respective owners. Their presence on this page is solely to identify the compared tools and illustrate functional differences. 1N2 GoalMatrix is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by those third-party publishers.

Comparison material is retained with the relevant screenshots, parameters and results so the demonstrations can be substantiated. Displayed volumes relate to the configurations shown and may vary with the criteria applied.

YOU CONTROL THE GRID.

Try the full LOG for 7 days and test all six filters on your own 1X2 combinations.

REQUEST MY FULL TRIALExamples illustrate filtering and reduction mechanisms. GoalMatrix takes no bets and guarantees neither sporting results nor winnings.